Cloud Storage

7 open source tools compared. Sorted by stars. Scroll down for our analysis.

Tool	Stars	Velocity	Language	License	Score
Syncthing Open source continuous file synchronization	84.0k	+343/wk	Go	Mozilla Public License 2.0	81
MinIO High-performance S3-compatible object store	60.9k	+47/wk	Go	GNU Affero General Public License v3.0	76
Rclone rsync for cloud storage — 70+ backends	57.2k	+134/wk	Go	MIT License	86
Nextcloud Self-hosted cloud platform	34.9k	+65/wk	PHP	GNU Affero General Public License v3.0	73
FileBrowser Web-based file browser and manager	34.7k	+94/wk	Go	Apache License 2.0	83
rustfs	27.5k	+307/wk	Rust	Apache-2.0	83
files-sdk A unified storage SDK for object and blob backends. One small, honest API. Web-standards I/O.	651	-	TypeScript	MIT License	64

Stay ahead of the category

New tools and momentum shifts, every Wednesday.

Our Analysis

Syncthing84.0k★

Syncthing does peer-to-peer file synchronization between your devices: laptop, phone, NAS, server. No central server, no account, no subscription. Your files go directly between your devices, encrypted in transit. Mozilla Public License 2.0, written in Go. It's like Dropbox but you own every piece of it. Set it up on two devices, point them at a folder, and changes sync automatically. It handles conflict resolution, versioning, and works across NATs without port forwarding (using relay servers for discovery, but actual data transfer is direct when possible). Everything is free. No paid tier, no premium features, no cloud storage costs. You're using your own devices' storage. The catch: there's no web interface for accessing files remotely. It syncs between devices that are running Syncthing. If your laptop is off, your phone can't pull a file from it. Dropbox/Google Drive solve this with always-on cloud storage. Syncthing also requires at least basic technical comfort to set up. It's not "install and drag to folder" simple. And mobile support (Android) works but is a second-class citizen compared to the desktop experience. iOS has no official app.

MinIO60.9k★

MinIO Console gives you a web UI for managing your MinIO object storage: browse buckets, upload files, manage users, configure policies, and monitor performance. Drop-in S3 replacement. Every tool that speaks S3 speaks MinIO. Performance is the headline. MinIO consistently benchmarks as one of the fastest object stores available, open source or not. Written in Go, single binary, runs anywhere. Docker, Kubernetes, bare metal, even a Raspberry Pi if you're feeling ambitious. This is the established standard for self-hosted object storage. It's what companies use when they want S3 compatibility without the AWS bill. Fully free to self-host under AGPL-3.0. No feature gates on the open source version: erasure coding, encryption, bucket replication, identity management, all included. The Enterprise license (MinIO SUBNET) adds a support subscription and some management tooling, but the software itself is identical. The catch: AGPL-3.0 means if you modify MinIO and offer it as a service, you must open source your changes. For internal use, this doesn't matter. For SaaS companies embedding it, talk to a lawyer. Also, operating a production MinIO cluster with replication across nodes is real ops work, not a weekend project.

Rclone57.2k★

Rclone is rsync for the cloud, moving data between S3, Google Drive, Backblaze, Dropbox, and 70+ other backends. One CLI tool that speaks every cloud storage API. MIT license, Go. The backend list is absurd: AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Backblaze B2, Azure Blob, SFTP, FTP, and dozens more. Sync, copy, move, mount (as a local filesystem), serve (as HTTP/WebDAV/FTP), encrypt, and deduplicate. It does everything. Fully free. No paid tier, no premium backends, no hosted service. Every feature, every backend, every operation: $0. You pay your cloud storage provider, not Rclone. Solo developers: use it to sync your projects to S3, mount Google Drive on your Linux server, or migrate between providers. Small teams: automate backups in CI. Medium to large: build cloud storage workflows; Rclone handles the plumbing. The catch: it's CLI-only (there's a web GUI but it's basic). The number of flags and options is overwhelming; `rclone , help` is a novel. Getting the right combination for your specific sync scenario takes trial and error. And mounting cloud storage as a local filesystem works but performance depends entirely on your internet connection and the provider's API latency. Don't expect local disk speeds.

Nextcloud34.9k★

Nextcloud gives you your own Google Drive, Calendar, and Contacts without putting your files on someone else's servers. File storage, sharing, calendar, contacts, video calls, office document editing, email, tasks, notes, and a growing app store. It's the self-hosted productivity platform that tries to replace all of Google Workspace. The community edition is free under AGPL-3.0. You get everything: file sync, 200+ apps from the app store, OnlyOffice/Collabora integration for document editing, end-to-end encryption, and the full groupware suite. No feature restrictions. Nextcloud Enterprise adds support contracts, branding, compliance certifications, and priority bug fixes. Pricing starts around $3,600/year for 100 users (basic support) and scales up with users and support tier. Self-hosting is the default. The Snap package or Docker image gets you running in 30 minutes. But running it well (with proper caching (Redis), a real database (MySQL/Postgres), and background jobs configured) takes real ops work. Performance degrades noticeably without tuning. Solo developers: great personal cloud. Install on a $5/mo VPS and sync your life. Small teams: solid replacement for Google Workspace if someone can maintain it. Growing teams: the all-in-one approach means you're running one platform instead of ten, but the maintenance burden grows with users. The catch: performance. Nextcloud is PHP-based and gets sluggish without Redis caching, database optimization, and proper PHP-FPM tuning. The mobile apps are functional but not polished. And the "app for everything" approach means some features feel bolted on rather than purpose-built.

FileBrowser34.7k★

FileBrowser gives you a web-based file manager for your server's filesystem, accessible from any browser. No dependencies, no database, just run it and you have a clean file manager accessible from any browser. It's a self-hosted Google Drive UI for your server's filesystem. Upload, download, rename, move, edit text files, and share public links. It handles multiple users with permissions, so you can give different people access to different directories. Apache 2.0. Written in Go, deploys as a single binary or Docker container. Fully free, no paid tier. The catch: this is a file browser, not a sync solution. There's no desktop client, no mobile app, no offline access, no version history. If you need Dropbox-style sync across devices, look at Nextcloud or Syncthing. FileBrowser is for when you want a web UI on top of a server filesystem, nothing more, nothing less. The simplicity is the feature.

rustfs27.5k★

RustFS is a MinIO alternative written in Rust. It speaks the S3 API, so any tool that works with AWS S3 works with RustFS. The pitch is performance: Rust's memory safety and efficiency versus MinIO's Go implementation. Self-hosting is free under Apache 2.0. You get S3-compatible API, erasure coding for data durability, distributed mode for spreading storage across nodes, and a web console for management. The catch: this is very new. It's getting a lot of attention, but attention isn't maturity. MinIO has been battle-tested in production for years. RustFS documentation is still developing, and the ecosystem of plugins, integrations, and operational knowledge is thin. If you're storing data you can't afford to lose, this is a risk. If you're experimenting with self-hosted object storage or building a non-critical pipeline, it's worth a look. But for production storage, MinIO is the safer bet today.

files-sdk651★

Files SDK is a TypeScript library that gives you one API across S3, R2, GCS, Azure Blob, Vercel Blob, Dropbox, and the local filesystem. The methods are predictable: upload, download, head, delete, copy, list, url, signedUploadUrl. MIT licensed, web-standards-friendly (Blob, File, ReadableStream, Uint8Array, ArrayBuffer, string). `npm install files-sdk` plus the adapter you want, like `files-sdk/s3` or `files-sdk/r2`. Each adapter is tree-shakeable so you only ship what you use. There is an escape hatch (`files.raw`) when you need provider-specific behavior. Bundled tool wrappers exist for the Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI Responses, OpenAI Agents, and the Anthropic Claude Agent SDK, which makes it useful for letting agents upload and fetch files. Solo developers and small teams building products that might switch storage providers should use this. It is the kind of abstraction you wish you had wired in before you shipped six S3-specific code paths across your codebase. The catch is the project is young and small. Version 1.2 shipped in May 2026, with one primary maintainer (Hayden Bleasel). For internal projects and side work, that is fine. For mission-critical infrastructure where you cannot risk a stalled dependency, vendor it or wait until the project has more contributors.