Tools/mono/SkiaSharp

SkiaSharp

SkiaSharp is a cross-platform 2D graphics API for .NET platforms based on Google's Skia Graphics Library. It provides a comprehensive 2D API that can be used across mobile, server and desktop models to render images.

5.5k+9/wkemergingC#MIT Licensetrending

The Lens

By Erik Loyd, SaaS CEO and former COO/CFO of an AWS Premier Partner.

Updated May 2026

SkiaSharp gives .NET developers access to Skia, the same 2D rendering engine that powers Chrome, Android, and Flutter. Cross-platform from day one across Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and WASM. Free and MIT-licensed.

This is the answer for .NET apps that need to draw beyond what System.Drawing or WPF provides (System.Drawing is being deprecated cross-platform anyway). PDFs, charts, image manipulation, custom controls in MAUI or Avalonia. The API is procedural and predictable. Not particularly hand-holding, but the docs are decent.

This is a primitive, not a product. There's no paid tier. You ship it inside your app via NuGet. Solo, small team, large team: same setup, just `dotnet add package SkiaSharp`. Performance is good because the heavy lifting is native code under the hood.

The catch is that the cross-platform native binaries can be a deployment headache. AOT compilation, mobile linking, and self-contained publishing all need attention. Test your release builds on every target platform you care about, not just the one your dev machine runs.

Free vs Self-Hosted vs Paid

fully free

Free: MIT license, distributed via NuGet, all platforms supported. No commercial tier.

Self-hosted reality: It's a library, not a service. You add it to your project and ship it in your app's binaries. Native dependencies make CI builds and deployment slightly more complex than a pure-managed library.

No paid tier: Microsoft and the .NET Foundation maintain it as part of the open source .NET ecosystem.

Free library. Costs are deployment complexity, not licensing.

Self-hosting ops:trivial

Get tools like this every Wednesday

One featured tool, three on the radar. No fluff.

Score
80/100 · A
Adoption21/30
Maintenance25/25
Community9/20
License15/15
Analysis10/10

A low score is not a verdict on quality. Young and niche tools start low by design. How we calculate scores

Trust Signals

Community discussions enabledOrganization account (243 public repos)

License: MIT License

Use freely, including commercial. Just keep the license.

Commercial use: ✓ Yes

About

Owner
Mono Project (Organization)
Stars
5,526
Forks
643

Explore Further

More tools in the directory