Tools/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

ARIS ⚔️ (Auto-Research-In-Sleep) — Lightweight Markdown-only skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review loops, idea discovery, and experiment automation. No framework, no lock-in — works with Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, or any LLM agent.

14.3k+370/wkgrowthPythonMIT Licensetrending

The Lens

By Erik Loyd, SaaS CEO and former COO/CFO of an AWS Premier Partner.

Updated Aug 2026

ARIS (Auto-Research-In-Sleep) automates ML research overnight. You give Claude Code a research question or experiment, walk away, and come back to results, with cross-model review gates designed to catch hallucinations and fabricated citations along the way.

It's a Markdown-only skills bundle, no framework, no lock-in. Claude Code is the driver, but the review loop pulls in GPT, DeepSeek, and other providers to check each other's work. The skill set (67+ bundled) covers literature review, idea discovery, experiment automation, paper writing, and rebuttal drafting. MIT licensed, with hardening that came from real NeurIPS submission cycles, not vibes.

Solo ML researchers and small academic teams running into the same paper-writing grind every conference cycle get the biggest win. Industry research teams with full MLOps platforms probably don't need this. The cross-model review piece is the differentiator. Most overnight-agent setups skip it and ship hallucinated citations.

The catch: autonomous overnight loops only work if your constraints are tight. Vague goals produce vague output and burn through credits. And the cross-model review means every iteration costs multiple LLM calls instead of one. Budget accordingly, especially if you're routing to GPT or Claude Opus for the reviewer role.

Free vs Self-Hosted vs Paid

fully free

Fully open source under MIT. No paid tier, no hosted version. The skills are Markdown files you drop into your agent setup. Real cost is the LLM API spend across providers, since the cross-model review means you're paying GPT or DeepSeek to check Claude's work and vice versa. Overnight loops without tight scope can rack up serious bills fast.

Free under MIT. Cost is LLM API spend, multiplied because every iteration runs cross-model review.

Self-hosting ops:trivial
View pricing page →

Get tools like this every Wednesday

One featured tool, three on the radar. No fluff.

Similar Tools

Score
91/100 · A+
Adoption27/30
Maintenance25/25
Community14/20
License15/15
Analysis10/10

A low score is not a verdict on quality. Young and niche tools start low by design. How we calculate scores

Trust Signals

Growing adoption: 6,823 starsActive community: 636 forksPermissive license (MIT)

License: MIT License

Use freely, including commercial. Just keep the license.

Commercial use: ✓ Yes

About

Owner
Yang Ruofeng (User)
Stars
14,344
Forks
1,271
Reddit
discussed

Explore Further

More tools in the directory