Tools/getpelican/pelican

Pelican

Static site generator for Markdown and reST

13.3kgrowthPythonGNU Affero General Public License v3.0new this week

The Lens

By Erik Loyd, SaaS CEO and former COO/CFO of an AWS Premier Partner.

Updated Mar 2026

Pelican generates static sites from Python with no JavaScript framework, no build system drama, no React. Pelican generates HTML from your content files and that's it. It's a Python-based static site generator that's been around since 2010 and does exactly one thing well.

AGPL v3. You write Markdown, run a command, get a folder of HTML files you can host anywhere for pennies. Themes, plugins, RSS feeds, code syntax highlighting, all built in.

Fully free. No paid tier, no cloud service, no account. You install it with pip, write content, generate, deploy to any static host (Netlify, Vercel, GitHub Pages, an S3 bucket, all free or nearly free).

The catch: Pelican is old-school. No hot reload, no component system, no modern frontend niceties. The theme ecosystem is smaller and less polished than Hugo or Astro. And AGPL v3 means if you modify Pelican itself and offer it as a service, you must open source your changes. For a personal blog or documentation site, it's solid and simple. For anything interactive, look elsewhere.

Free vs Self-Hosted vs Paid

fully free

Fully open source under AGPL v3. No paid tier, no hosted service, no premium features.

Total cost of running a Pelican site:

  • Pelican itself: $0
  • Hosting on GitHub Pages/Netlify/Vercel: $0
  • Custom domain: ~$12/year
  • Total: $12/year for a fully functional website

There's genuinely nothing to pay for here. The AGPL license only matters if you modify Pelican's source and distribute it; using it to generate your site doesn't trigger any obligations.

Free. No paid tier exists. Host the output anywhere for $0.

Self-hosting ops:trivial

Get tools like this every Wednesday

One featured tool, three on the radar. No fluff.

Similar Tools

Score
63/100 · B
Adoption27/30
Maintenance10/25
Community9/20
License7/15
Analysis10/10

A low score is not a verdict on quality. Young and niche tools start low by design. How we calculate scores

Trust Signals

High adoption: 13,275 starsActive community: 1,834 forks

About

Stars
13,331
Forks
1,823

Explore Further

More tools in the directory