
mediawiki
🌻 The collaborative editing software that runs Wikipedia. Mirror from https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/g/mediawiki/core. See https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_access for contributing.
The Lens
MediaWiki is the software that runs Wikipedia, and you can run it yourself. It is a mature, extensible wiki platform: collaborative editing with full page history, templates, over 350 languages, and a deep extension ecosystem. If you want a knowledge base or internal wiki that scales to hundreds of millions of readers and has two decades of hardening behind it, this is the proven answer. GPL licensed and free.
Self-hosting is a classic LAMP-style setup: PHP, a database (MySQL or MariaDB), and a web server. Getting a basic wiki up is genuinely simple, and it runs on modest hardware. The work comes later, with extensions, spam control, upgrades, and scaling, which is real but well-trodden ground with enormous community documentation.
For a team or community that needs a serious collaborative wiki, MediaWiki is free, battle-tested, and hard to outgrow. Solo users often find it heavier than a personal notes tool warrants; it shines with many editors, not one. Larger organizations get the most out of it, and there are hosted providers if you would rather not run PHP yourself.
The catch is that MediaWiki feels like what it is: enterprise wiki software built for Wikipedia's needs, not a slick modern docs tool. The editing experience and default look are dated next to Notion or a static docs site, and making it pretty takes skinning and extension work. Choose it for durability, scale, and openness, not for out-of-the-box polish.
Free vs Self-Hosted vs Paid
fully freeFree: GPL licensed. Full collaborative wiki: version history, templates, 350+ languages, huge extension ecosystem. Powers Wikipedia.
Self-hosted: Standard PHP + database (MySQL/MariaDB) + web server. Basic install is simple; extensions, spam control, upgrades, and scaling are ongoing.
Paid: No paid tier from Wikimedia. Third-party hosted MediaWiki providers exist for teams that would rather not self-host.
Free and battle-tested. Unmatched at scale, dated in polish next to modern docs tools.
Get tools like this every Wednesday
One featured tool, three on the radar. No fluff.
Similar Tools

Open source self-hosted note-taking

A platform to create documentation/wiki content built with PHP & Laravel

Open source Notion alternative

A fully open source & end-to-end encrypted note taking alternative to Evernote.

A free, open source note-taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities.

LLM Wiki is a cross-platform desktop application that turns your documents into an organized, interlinked knowledge base — automatically. Instead of traditional RAG (retrieve-and-answer from scratch every time), the LLM incrementally builds and maintains a persistent wiki from your sources。
A low score is not a verdict on quality. Young and niche tools start low by design. How we calculate scores
Trust Signals
License: GPL-2.0-or-later
Review license manually.
Commercial use: ✗ Restricted
About
- Owner
- Wikimedia (Organization)
- Stars
- 5,109
- Forks
- 1,552
Explore Further
More tools in the directory
kreuzberg
A polyglot document intelligence framework with a Rust core. Extract text, metadata, images, and structured information from PDFs, Office documents, images, and 91+ formats. Available for Rust, Python, Ruby, Java, Go, PHP, Elixir, C#, R, C, TypeScript (Node/Bun/Wasm/Deno)- or use via CLI, REST API, or MCP server.
8.6k ★openemr
The most popular open source electronic health records and medical practice management solution.
5.3k ★panel
âš¡ AcePanel - Enterprise server operation and maintenance management panel
2.9k ★